Unknown's avatar

About kb

free spirit, lover of red wine, bacon, sushi, the ocean, and adventure. I work in the legal field, do freelance writing, and take care of children.

On New York and the Dark Cloud

New York was lovely. I was so ready to come home, though. The flight back was miserable, compounded by the woman behind us. Imagine all of the stereotypes about people from Queens (yeah, the negative ones), and then multiply them by 10. It was ear-splitting, nails-on-a-chalkboard unbearable.

Alas, I arrived home to a very anxious boyfriend and a beautiful bouquet of roses. (I haven’t gotten roses since high school – this was unexpected and wonderful.)

I will make you a lovely post and show you pictures, but until then, I’ve got a darker cloud hanging over my head. I’m in a state of terribly unhealthy uncertainty.

There are so many wonderful things. There have been so many wonderful moments. My life thus far has been a very beautiful place to be. Ever since I found out that I didn’t get into grad school, I’ve been anxious. Not the kind of anxious that threatens to overwhelm you at any moment, but the kind of anxious that creeps through your body, ever-present in your blood, your thoughts, your dreams. I’m uncertain of the future, and I am well aware that I stand on the edge of a great divide. It’s now or never (sort of). Where I am situated offers me a wide variety of options and it’s time for me to do some soul-searching and figure out where I want to belong in this world. That’s the easy part, even though at the moment, I am entirely overwhelmed. After that, I have to set forward and strive to accomplish the goals I haven’t set yet. You see? It’s all so much and I’m finding myself incredibly jealous of my friends who know exactly what they want to do.

On the plus side, you can look forward to more years of panicky blog posts and overstated melodrama, so that may or may not be a plus.

On choosing

Sometimes making choices is easy. There is a right and a wrong. There is at least enough to sway you to choose one option over the other. And sometimes, it’s not easy. There is no right, wrong, or otherwise. Everything is equal.

I’m staring my choices straight in the face and I’m torn. Stability, security, comfortable vs. unknown, unproven, possibly uncomfortable.

It’s terrifying. I know that no matter what the choice is, I will win. But I also know that not everyone involved will.

Sometimes there’s nothing wrong, but there could be so much more right.
Is that enough to make the leap?

On Gay. On Suicide. On Bullying.

It’s been awhile, I know. Work keeps getting in the way of the rest of my life.

But alas, I’ve got something to say that’s important enough for me to give up some time to say it.

Jacob posted a link to a Rolling Stone article on my Facebook wall. (I think we still get a subscription to the magazine, but I hadn’t read it, so this goes to show that I’m out of touch with everything.)

It was about bullying and gay teens. While I think the article has some serious flaws (look at me, being all critical), I do think that it raises some serious questions about problems with having policies specifically related to homosexuality in our public schools.

But more than that, I (never thought I’d say this) partially agree with one of the anti-gay groups when they say, “…much of society seems not to be looking closely and openly at all possible causes of the tragedies.” Granted, they did precede that by saying “Because homosexual activists have hijacked and exploited teen suicides for their moral and political utility…” so that still makes them really insensitive and downright hateful.

We do need to really examine these tragedies. Being a child, an adolescent, a young adult: it all really sucks. I had such a rough time because of bullying in grade school – I remember crying and begging to go a new school. I withdrew quite a bit in high school but came out of it just fine. Bullying isn’t just about gay kids. Bullying is about anything, everything. Kids are really cruel. And it blows, for everyone involved. People carry those emotional scars with them long after the bullying has ended.

So let’s talk about parenting, because that’s where those little seeds of hatred get planted, nourished, and encouraged to grow. These parents hold certain political ideologies, certain religious beliefs, and live by an individual moral code. It stands to reason that their children will as well, having grown up hearing their parents espouse their beliefs, complaining about taxes, etc. That’s not the problem. The problem is when parents fail to explain to their children that there are other (equal) ways of thinking. I respect your beliefs; I respect your rights; I cannot respect your hatred, no matter where it comes from. We’re all guilty of putting a blanket over the “other” and forgetting that those people all believe those things because it gives them strength, hope, faith, solace, comfort, joy.

But at what point does my right to believe in whatever I want stop? At the point at which it infringes on someone else’s right to believe in whatever they want. This is why schoolyards are going to remain a political battleground.

They say that knowledge is power and it’s true. I don’t know why we’re against teaching our kids anything. At one point in the Rolling Stone article, a woman named Barb Anderson is quoted as saying, “Open your eyes, people. What if a 15-year-old is seduced into homosexual behavior and then contracts AIDS?” I wasn’t aware that we’re still under the impression that only the gays get AIDS. Yes, 61% of new HIV infections are found in “men who have sex with men” or MSM, according to the CDC. (I always read MSM as metro-sexual men, so that’s problematic for my brain.) But 23% of all new infections are in women. And the race most affected? Black men.
How many people know this? How many people can pull this out of their heads? Not knowing breeds fear and fear breeds the sad situations we’re seeing today. Fear breeds death, hatred, bigotry, disgust, anger. Fear does not bring about positive change, cooperation, or community.

I just don’t know why we’re not teaching our children everything that we can teach them. Creationism, evolution, reincarnation – we should be teaching it all. French, algebra, history, banned books: learn it all! I’m much more comfortable arguing with someone who’s chosen to believe what they believe than I am arguing with someone who’s had their beliefs molded and shaped for them. Schools should be a place of academic achievement, not fear. Teachers report being afraid to address the bullying situations that may be based on perceived or real homosexuality because they don’t want to lose their jobs. So these kids are left alone and helpless to cope with bullying that they don’t understand and can’t control.

Youth is a very fragile time. Even though these people are quickly growing into young adults, they’re not there yet. They need to be taught. Educated. Supported. Mental health issues among teenagers are increasing. Depression, suicide, eating disorders and behaviors are becoming increasingly more and more common.

The US lacks the mental health resources to treat the growing number of kids displaying symptoms. The social stigma surrounding mental health prevents a lot of progress and instead, causes much more harm to our society than a progressive dialogue would. (I’m not known for my avoidance of issues, but I’ve been avoiding talking about my own ADHD diagnosis and treatment for fear of negative repercussions.) We medicate, medicate, medicate. I don’t agree that that’s a great solution to any problem, mental health related or not. But it is too bad there’s no medication to make insensitive, insecure teens blind to differences.

But that’s exactly it: these teens (both the ones doing the bullying and the ones being bullied) are insecure. They’re trying to establish their own identities while being assaulted by their own hormones on a daily basis. They’re trying to figure out where they fit in the world, and they’re using anything they can for guidance. Instead of knowing that their bullying might stem from their attempts to appear more masculine, they think that this bullying makes them more powerful, respected, admired. It doesn’t. It makes them weaker than they’d be if they approached these in-school social situations more logically. But they don’t know that, because no one has ever explained all of that to them. Let’s start teaching sociology in the fourth grade and see how far that gets us. If kids could understand more about what they’re feeling and experiencing, they’re far more likely to make the mature choices not to engage in behaviors. But instead, they’re left to fend for themselves, trying to make sense of everything without appearing weak. Newsflash: we’re all weak. We all need help, support, and guidance.

Feel-good seminars and classroom discussions aren’t going to help either. The message that these kids are getting is that being gay is all butt-sex and glitter. While that’s simply not true, they don’t have any real-life context for understanding homosexuality. In reality, being gay is just like being straight. Couples wear ugly sweaters and make dinner and fight about who’s going to take out the trash. Short-shorts aren’t the norm. But how are these kids going to understand that when we won’t talk about it, teach it, or protect the gay kids from being attacked? Oh wait, there’s always TV. (That’ll help.) Our examples are terrible representations of what gay is.

Gay. Bullying. Suicide. They go hand in hand and they exist separately. In order to get to the bottom of this to stop our kids from killing themselves or driving others to kill themselves, we need to take a long, hard look at the messages that we’re sending to them.

If I ever catch my kid(s) bullying, or engaging in any behavior that I find predatory, disrespectful, or downright offensive, there will be hell to pay. The parents of the kids who say things like, “You’re a fag and you deserve to die,” should be held accountable for the actions of their children. This is a really good example of when it’s okay to ask “What would Jesus do?” Your religions, whatever they may be, do not say that it’s okay to hurt other people. They do not say that it’s okay for you to taunt, tease, punish, and terrorize your peers.

Instead of fighting about what we can’t teach, let’s just teach it all. Let’s teach everything and let our kids learn to think for themselves. Let’s expose them to everything we can expose them to. Let’s make them cultured, intelligent, young people who have adventured, and failed, and come to understand the ways that the world works.

Let’s fight to end teen suicides. Let’s fight to end bullying. But more than that, we need to fight to give our kids the coping skills to handle these things when they do happen. We need to address these issues openly, so that when a kid thinks about committing suicide, they are able to reach out to someone who can help them. So that when a kid thinks about putting another kid down just so he/she can feel better about him/herself, that kid will think twice.

I know that it gets better, but they don’t. It’s up to us to guide them all through.

On Wine, subtly

I’m a huge fan of wine. More than that, I’m a huge fan of affordable wine. There are plenty of delicious Malbecs for under $20, so both my bank account and myself can remain happy. Ha, but sometimes you do get what you pay for. I’m looking at you, $4.99 bottle of Gato Negro.

The article below serves to validate my frugality when it comes to purchasing wine:

Most Of Us Just Can’t Taste The Nuances In High-Priced Wines

02:56 am

March 6, 2012

EnlargeiStockphoto.com
Research suggests that most of us don’t or can’t taste the subtleties of fine wines.

Have you ever splurged on a highly rated bottle of Burgundy or pinot noir, only to wonder whether a $10 or $15 bottle of red would have been just as good? The answer may depend on your biology.

A new study by researchers at Penn State finds that when it comes to appreciating the subtleties of wine, experts can taste things many of us can’t. “What we found is that the fundamental taste ability of an expert is different,” says John Hayes of Penn State.

So what explains this? Part of it has to do with training and experience. But our ability to identify nuances in wine is also influenced by physiology in our mouths and brains.

“We evaluated hundreds of wine drinkers,” says Hayes, by having them sample/taste a chemical that measures their reaction to bitter tastes. He found that wine experts — people such as wine writers, winemakers and wine retailers — were about 40 percent more sensitive to the bitterness than casual consumers of wine. They have a more acute sense of taste.

Hayes says his findings fit with prior research on so-calledsupertasters — people who are more sensitive to the sweetness of sugar, the sting of chili peppers and the saltiness of chips.

The experts I reached out to are not convinced that “biology” is as deterministic as the research may suggest. “There may be some people who are gifted tasters,” Dave McIntyre, who writes about wine for The Washington Post, wrote to me in an email. “But I think it’s mostly experience.”

He says he’s taken the time and made the effort to taste many, many wines. “If you taste enough Cabernet Sauvignon you’ll learn to tell it from Merlot,” MacIntyre says. And over time, if you pay attention, he says he thinks most people will heighten their ability to detect nuances.

But for those of us who are not inclined to invest a lot of time in wine-tasting, should we pay attention to those wine reviewers’ ratings and scores?

A 90-point rating may tell us that an expert thinks the wine is a good choice. And the higher the point rating, the higher the price point. But what if the critics’ palates are not in sync with ours?

“Wine shopping can be confusing and overwhelming,” Katherine Cole, a wine writer in Portland, wrote to us. She says to some extent, the point ratings can help us narrow our choices. When you spot a bottle in your price range, and you see one of those “shelf talkers” (the term she uses to describe those little tabs affixed to store shelves) that tout a 90-point rating (on a 100-point scale), it can make the decision easier. “Oh, Wine & Spiritsmagazine likes this wine, so it must be good.”

Experts all seem to acknowledge that there’s quite a bit of subjectivity involved in reviewing wine. “Every critic has his or her own taste,” Cole says, “so the same wine might garner wildly differing scores from a variety of critics.”

All of this leads me to the conclusion, that yes, I’ll try to use experience as my teacher. But I’m not going to be ashamed by my affordable favorites. I may not have the most experienced of wine palates, but I’ve found plenty of pleasant $10-$15 Syrahs and Malbecs — two of my favorites — and I’m sticking with them!

Tags: food scienceflavor sciencewine

Pictures of Chicago from Nick Debono Photography!

Nick Debono Photography's avatarNick Debono Photography

My trip to Chicago, IL…. Where do I begin haha

As a photographer there are certain locations, places, and destinations that will spark your interest and fit your style.. Chicago, was one of them. I had always wanted to go to Chicago, I heard so many things about this city good, and bad. I wouldn’t let the bad stop me. To star off here are some cool & interesting facts about Chicago:

1. Chicago was one of the first and largest municipalities to require public art as part of the renovation or construction of municipal buildings, with the passage of the Percentage-for-Arts Ordinance in 1978.

2. The Willis Tower (formerly Sears Tower) is the tallest building in the Western Hemisphere at 110 stories high. Its elevators are among the fastest in the world operating as fast as 1,600 feet per minute.

(continues below)

3. The first televised U.S. presidential candidates’ debate was…

View original post 475 more words

On “Nine you’re fine, ten you’re mine”

I love the idea of photo radar. Love it.

I have no idea where my insurance card or proof of registration are. Glove compartment? Probably, but getting to them will take hours of digging through papers and probably freaking out, then trying not to cry while the cop is standing there, or worse, making you wait anxiously by the side of the road while he or she goes to check all your stuff.

(Flashback to high school, when I got pulled over for having a headlight out and then made the police officer hold the contents of my glove compartment while I dug out all of the insurance paperwork for the last couple of years. It was bad. Thankfully, he was very understanding. He let me go after I used the “Date of Next Service” tag in my windshield to prove that I had an oil change appointment the next day and would be able to get the light fixed. Then we joked about crossing double yellow lines. But as I drove away, my heart was pounding. I’ve never been good at confrontation, particularly with authority figures. Eek!)

Photo radar is the best of everything: the city gets money, you don’t have to deal with the police, and the ticket is ZERO POINTS! Your insurance won’t go up! You just send the city a check and you’re on your merry way.

Why is anyone upset about this? This is amazing.

If I’m speeding (which I usually am), I have no problem getting caught by photo radar and sending in a check. As long as my insurances goes up and my license points are preserved, we’re all winning.

For the record, I haven’t gotten a ticket since my senior year of high school. (Knock on wood.)

Murphy: Denver’s photo traffic enforcement on the radar

POSTED:   03/05/2012 01:00:00 AM MST
UPDATED:   03/05/2012 10:30:29 AM MST

By Chuck Murphy
Denver Post Columnist

Photo enforcement agent Katie Salas sits in the specially equipped van and monitors traffic on East 17th Avenue and Cook Street recently. In less than 90 minutes, Salas cited 56 violators — people who were going above 40 mph in the 30-mph-zone.. (Helen H. Richardson, The Denver Post)

The first thing you notice when you spend some time with the photo-radar-enforcement van is that every driver is speeding.

Well, maybe not every driver. Because the second thing you notice is that older (or more experienced, if you prefer) drivers save everyone trapped behind them a lot of money.

On this day last week, photo-enforcement agent Katie Salas has parked her specially modified van on Denver’s East 17th Avenue at Cook Street.

Now, you may think that locations such as this — a four-lane commuter route, near a high school, and across the street from a park — are chosen because they will produce the most revenue for the city. Not so, said Ted Porras, supervisor of Denver’s “photo enforcement unit.”

“We’re restricted to three areas: safety zones (like park boundaries), school zones and residential zones with posted speed limits of no more than 35 mph,” Porras explained. “Believe me, if we enforced along Colorado Boulevard, we would see more.”

Hard to imagine, because we are about to see plenty. But first, there are a lot of rules to follow in the photo-radar-enforcement- van business.

It must be parked in such a way that the radar can shoot across the traffic lanes, and so the operator will be able to clearly see every car the radar clocks as a violator.

Next, the big blue “PHOTO RADAR IN USE AHEAD” sign must be posted facing the drivers who are about to get cited. Denver requires it to be at least 325 feet from the van. Salas and Porras will mark off more than 500 feet for this “enforcement” activity because they want to make sure drivers are notified in plenty of time to see the 30-mph speed limit and know that the van is ahead. Their benevolence has nothing to do with the presence of a newspaper columnist. Of this I am certain.

Now, the system must be checked and calibrated. Salas must get her paperwork together to note the body type of every vehicle captured on camera as a violator.

Agent Salas sits in the photo-radar van Wednesday. The radar issues a citation only if a driver is going more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit. Drivers are alerted of the photo-radar use by a sign placed at least 325 feet from the van. (Helen H. Richardson, The Denver Post)
The system is then set to trigger at 40 mph, 10 above the posted speed limit, and, after more than 20 minutes of preparation, we are ready.
“Now, we wait,” Salas said. Not for long we don’t.

Beep. Flash. Beep. Flash. Beep. Flash. In the space of three minutes, five cars have broken the 40-mph barrier, and nearly every car that passed was going faster than 30. A total of 46 will earn $40 Penalty Assessment Notices before an hour is up. Everyone, including bus drivers, cops, firefighters and the sheriff’s deputy who flew past this day, gets their photo taken and a notice of violation in the mail. If fishing were this easy, it would be boring and it would probably be illegal anyway.

Lots of people think this should be.

Denver’s auditor said police should be forced to prove photo traffic enforcement has a safety benefit, or it should be closed as nothing more than a “cash grab.” (Denver collected more than $2 million in the last fiscal year from the combined red-light/radar programs). The legislature briefly considered a bill banning the cameras, but it has beenset aside for now. Some argue that you don’t have to pay when the notice arrives in the mail — technically true, but if you ignore it they will just send someone out to serve you personally, andit will cost you at least $25 moreunless you can get it dismissed. (Yup, you get to pay for the privilege of being personally served.)

So photo radar enforcement is with us for at least another year, and there are a couple of things you should probably know.

Flashing your headlights, swerving or hiding behind other traffic does not work. Neither does a middle-finger salute (Salas gets a lot of those). Your best bet is to hit the brakes. You might just slow down in time, and that’s OK with Salas.

“That’s what we’re here for,” she said.

There is indeed a person inside the van, and she is not Satan.

Salas is the mom of a school-age son, and, while she takes no particular pleasure in helping catch speeders, she harbors no guilt either.

“We enforce around elementary schools a lot, and I feel pretty good about that,” she said.

So, next time you see the big blue sign, please slow down. It will save you money, and if the van is there, there may be kids, parkgoers or construction workers nearby too. Maybe even give the photo-enforcement agent a nice wave.

Use all your fingers.

Read more:Murphy: Denver’s photo traffic enforcement on the radar – The Denver Post  source: http://www.denverpost.com/murphy/ci_20102377#ixzz1oGeTGd87